Friday, November 15, 2013

First Terrorist of Independent India

- Subhash Gatade
...Government have, however, noticed with regret that in practice members of Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh have not adhered to their professed ideals.
“Undesirable and even dangerous activities have been carried on by the members of the Sangh. It has been found that in several parts of the country individual members of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh have indulged in acts of violence involving arson, robbery, dacoity and murder and have collected illicit arms and ammunitions. They have been found circulating leaflets, exhorting people to resort to terrorist methods, to collect firearms, to create disaffection against the government and suborn the police and military.”
(The government communique of February 4, 1948, announcing the ban on RSS after Gandhi’s assassination)
On Nathuram Godse, (19 th May 1910 - 15 th Nov 1949) Advani asserts that Godse had “severed links with RSS in 1933… had begun to bitterly criticise the RSS”. This was flatly contradicted by none other than Godse’s brother Gopal, who was also an accused at the trial for conspiracy to murder. He published his book Why I Assassinated Mahatma Gandhi in December 1993. Speaking in New Delhi on the occasion of the release of his book, Gopal Godse revealed what many had suspected—they had both been active members of the RSS (The Statesman; December 24, 1993).
(Ref : Whitewashing Godse is part of the Sangh Parivar’s sordid game, From: Frontline, January 26, 2013)
I

What could be said to be the first act of terrorism in independent India?

Nathuram Godse
Everybody would agree that killing of Mahatma Gandhi by a Hindu fanatic Nathuram Godse constitutes the first terrorist act in independent India. Godse, a Maharashtrian Brahmin, hailing from Pune was associated with Hindu Mahasabha at the time of Mahatma’s assassination and had his initial forays in the world of politics with the RSS. During his tour of the area Hedgewar, the first supremo of RSS, use to be accompanied by Nathuram , the future assassin of Gandhi. Godse had in fact joined the RSS in 1930, winning prominence as a speaker and organiser.

The world at large knows how the Hindu fanatics had planned the murder of the Mahatma and how the likes of Savarkar and Golwalkar, the second Supremo of RSS could be held to be responsible for creating the ambience of hate which culminated in the gruesome act. Sardar Patel’s letter to Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, who was then member Hindu Mahasabha and who later formed Bharatiya Jansangh with RSS’s support provides enough details about the background (18 th July, 1948)
... our reports do confirm that, as a result of the activities of these two bodies, particularly the former (the RSS), an atmosphere was created in the country in which such a ghastly tragedy (Gandhiji’s assassination) became possible. There is no doubt in my mind that the extreme section of the Hindu Mahasabha was involved in this conspiracy. The activities of the RSS constituted a clear threat to the existence of government and the state. Our reports show that those activities, despite the ban, have not died down. Indeed, as time has marched on, the RSS circles are becoming more defiant and are indulging in their subversive activities in an increasing measure.
If somebody poses before you another simple query relating to similar episodes in the sixty plus year trajectory of independent India - then what would be your response. Perhaps you would like to add the death of Indira Gandhi - killed by her Sikh bodyguards , killing of Rajeev Gandhi - who fell to a suicide attack by a Tamil Hindu woman, or for that matter demolition of the 500 year old Babri mosque by the marauders of the RSS-VHP-BJP-Shiv Sena. If one follows the debate further you would like to underline the 1984 riots ( actually genocide of Sikhs mainly perpetrated by Hindu lumpen elements instigated by the then ruling Congress Party with due connivance of Hindutva brigade), emergence of Khalistani terrorists movement or the eight year old Gujarat genocide executed with military precision allegedly by the RSS and its affiliated organisations led by one of those Hindu Hriday Samrats.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

An Idiot for PM? (Non)Sense of History in NaMo

- Subhash Gatade

'Though this be madness yet there is method in it' 
                                                                     
                                                                       - 'Hamlet', Shakespeare

The 2014 elections aren’t merely about changing the government. The rhetoric ahead of the polls makes one believe that it’s an attempt at once to change historical narratives handed down to successive generation of Indians. And the man in the forefront of it all is the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.

                                                                  -  11/11/2013 Blogs-Hindustan Times

I.

Wordsmiths of the world need to put in their heads or pull in their socks (you may say) to coin a new word which can rather resonate with what goes on in this part of South Asia in the name of political speeches. Should one call it 'polifiction' or 'politainment' or some similar word. 

Perhaps a word exists and this poor pen pusher is ignorant about it. 

Anyway, the matter has become bit urgent with the feverish preparations which are going on here for the battle royale which would take place in the year 2014 and the not so silent emergence of NaMo on the national scene and the daily dose of half truths, fiction and complete distortion which goes under the name of oratory.

His recent speech in Gujarat which he delivered while inaugurating a hospital could be considered the pinnacle of his 'polifiction'. In the said speech he claimed that Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, was a 'great son of Gujarat and had built India house in London' He also claimed that this 'great son of Gujarat was in regular dialogue with Vivekanand and Dayanand Saraswati' and in his usual penchant for taking credits 'it was his good fortune to be able to bring back the ashthi (ashes) of Mukherjee from Geneva in 2003.'

Any layperson who has brief acquaintance with history or has not spent her/his formative years in one of those Parivar run schools, would share that Mukherjee ' was born in 1902 in the then undivided Bengal, worked with Hindu Mahasabha for quite some time, was part of Nehru's first cabinet, helped found Jansangha - a mass politival platoform for RSS - and died in 50s.' Perhaps anyone can marvel at the ability of a one year old Mukherjee to be in dialogue with Swami Vivekanand - who died in 1903 and would also be keen to know the method adopted by him to have a dialogue with Dayanand Saraswati who had died more than 25 years before his birth.

The fact of the matter is that it was not Mukherjee but Shyamji Krishna Varma from Kutchh Mandvi, (born 4 th October 1857) Gujarat, Indian Revolutionary, lawyer, Journalist, who had gone to London, developed the India house (1902) which later became the living space for many Indian freedom fighters, started an English monthly, ‘The Indian Sociologist’ an organ of political, social and religious reform. History books tell us that Shyamji had died in Geneva in 1930.

Supporters of NaMo can claim that the said speech - which showed his complete ignorance about the important milestone in the trajectory of his own organization, the formation of Bhartiya Jansangh, the first mass political platform launched by RSS itself, - was just slip of tongue and not much should be read into it. If that is the case, then how should one interpret his utterly false claim that Nehru did not even attend Patel's funeral - despite proof to the contrary - or what is the explanation for his 'pearls of wisdom' at Patna rally wherein he is reported to have said that Alexander had come to Bihar and was defeated by Biharis - despite the obvious fact that Alexander never crossed the Ganges - or placing Taxila in Bihar although it is in Pakistan or saying that Chandragupta Maurya the legendary King belonged to the Gupta dynasty. 

What one is concerned here not just slip of tongue here and there - which can happen with anyone - in fact it is a new genre of speech which is on the one hand (according to observers) 'entertaining' and 'captivating' but if one digs further one finds it is built on sheer fiction, to say the least. And there is no spontaneity involved here leading to 'slip of tongue', everything is deliberate, presented before the masses in a packaged form for wider consumption to serve the larger agenda based on exclusion and hate. 

In fact, it would not be off the mark if one says that NaMo has slowly metamorphosed into 'P N Oak' of Indian politics. It need be mentioned here that P N Oak was a very popular 'historian' in Hindutva circles who claimed that 'that Christianity and Islam are both derivatives of Hinduism, or that the Catholic Vatican, Kaaba and the Taj Mahal were once Hindu temples to Shiva'. 

मध्य प्रदेश में बदस्तूर जारी है शिक्षा का भगवाकरण

- जावेद अनीस

हमारे संविधान की उद्देशिका के अनुसार भारत एक समाजवादी, पंथनिरपेक्ष, लोकतंत्रात्मक गणराज्य है। संविधान के अनुसार राजसत्ता का कोई अपना धर्म नहीं होगा। उसके विपरीत संविधान भारत के सभी नागरिकों को सामाजिक, आर्थिक और राजनैतिक न्याय, विचार अभिव्यक्ति, विश्वास, धर्म और उपासना की स्वतंत्रता प्रतिष्ठा और अवसर की समता प्राप्त कराने का अधिकार प्रदान करता है। 

लेकिन मध्यप्रदेश में इसका ठीक इसका बिलकुल उल्टा हो रहा है।पिछले करीब एक दशक से भाजपा शासित सूबे मध्य प्रदेश में शिक्षण संस्थानो में एक खास तरह का राजनीतिक एजेंडा बड़ी खामोशी से लागू किया जा रहा है। 

इस की ताजा बानगी एक बार फिर से तब देखने को मिली जब बीते 1 अगस्त 2013 को प्रदेश की शिवराज सिंह सरकार ने मध्यप्रदेश राजपत्र में अधिसूचना जारी कर मदरसों में भी गीता पढ़ाया जाना अनिवार्य कर दिया था, जिसमें मध्यप्रदेश मदरसा बोर्ड से मान्यता प्राप्त सभी मदरसों में कक्षा तीन से कक्षा आठ तक सामान्य हिन्दी की तथा पहली और दूसरी की विशिष्ट अंग्रेरजी और उर्दू की पाठयपुस्तकों में भगवत गीता में बताये प्रसंगों पर एक एक अध्याय जोड़े जाने की अनुज्ञा की गयी थी और इसके लिए राज्य के पाठ्य पुस्तक अधिनियम में बकायदा जरूरी बदलाव भी किए गए थे। विधानसभा चुनावों से मात्र चार महीने पहले लिए गए इस फैसले ने बड़ा विवाद पैदा कर दिया था और खुद को भाजपा के “वाजपेयी इन वेटिंग” बनाने में लगे मुख्यमंत्री शिवराज सिंह चौहान को भारी विरोध और अपनी अपेक्षाकृत “उदार छवि” को नुकसान पहुचने के डर के चलते बड़ी आनन –फानन में अपना निर्णय वापस लेना पड़ा। 

दरअसल मध्य प्रदेश के सरकारी स्कलों में पहले से ही गीता पढ़ाई जा रही है. राज्य सरकार द्वारा 2011 में गीता को स्कूली पाठ्यक्रम में शामिल करने की घोषणा की थी. इंदौर में 13 नवंबर 2011 को स्कूलों में गीता पढ़ाने के निर्णय की घोषणा करते हुए मुख्यमंत्री ने कहा था कि “हिन्दुओं का पवित्र ग्रन्थ गीता” स्कूलों में पढ़ाया जाएगा भले ही इसका कितना ही विरोध क्यों न हो।” इसका भी नागरिक संगठनो और अल्पसंख्यक समाज द्वारा पुरजोर विरोध किया था। यह मामला हाई कोर्ट तक भी गया था। यह दुर्भाग्य ही कहा जायेगा कि माननीय उच्च न्यायालय ने मध्यप्रदेश शासन के राज्य के स्कूलों में “गीता सार” पढ़ाने के निर्णय पर अपनी मुहर लगाते हुए कहा कि “गीता मूलतः भारतीय दर्शन की पुस्तक है” किसी भारतीय धर्म की नहीं। । अदालत का यह निर्णय कैथोलिक बिशप काउंसिल द्वारा दायर एक याचिका पर आया था जिसमें यह मांग की गई थी कि केवल गीता ही नहीं बल्कि सभी धर्मों में निहित नैतिक मूल्यों से स्कूली विद्यार्थियों को परिचित कराया जाना चाहिए। मध्यप्रदेश उच्च न्यायालय इस निष्कर्ष पर पहुंचा कि चूंकि गीता दार्शनिक ग्रंथ है,धार्मिक नहीं इसलिए राज्य सरकार गीता का पठन-पाठन जारी रख सकती है और स्कूलों में अन्य धर्मों द्वारा प्रतिपादित नैतिक मूल्यों का ज्ञान दिया जाना आवश्यक नहीं है। इस आदेश के बाद सरकार के शिक्षा विभाग का हौसला बढा जिसका परिणाम ये एक अगस्त की अधिसूचना थी जिसमें गीता के पाठ पढाये जाने को मदरसों में भी अनिवार्य बनाया गया था।

A Gullgotia's Dairy Part- III

- Nagesh DB Rao

[This is the second part of the author's account of firsthand experience of the Indian variety of neoliberal education. Part memoir, part commentary, part unapologetic rant,A Gullgotia’s Diary hopes to reach you before Galgotias does. To read A Gullgotia's Dairy Part- I click here To read A Gullgotia's Dairy Part- II click here]

ENGLISH VINGLISH 

It struck me that, like this inappropriate building, I too had (been) parachuted in from abroad. I had some experience of higher education in India, having done my B.Sc. and M.A. in Bangalore, but that was as a student, and it was two decades ago. I was nervous about my unfamiliarity with the system, for sure, but also about my unfamiliarity with the culture, the language, the people. For a while there, I lost all confidence in my spoken Hindi, as I struggled to make sense of the rural U. P. accent I heard in Greater Noida. I assumed that I would spend a few months after I arrived at Galgotias University, perhaps a year, getting acquainted with the place. At work, I had hoped to find other faculty to collaborate with, and to ease gradually into the job I thought I’d been hired to do–help build an interdisciplinary programme in the humanities and social sciences.

But the idea of slow and steady organic growth is alien to the corporate university, whose main objective is to make a lot of money, and make it quick. Acquiring all this farmland (whether by hook or by crook, who knows?), constructing this Canadian-designed campus, and getting the U. P. state government to “deem” it a university, not to mention all the fancy advertising and PR, must have cost the Galgotia family a pretty penny for sure.

So the owner’s objective, as was communicated to us often, was to “break even” as quickly as possible. This meant expanding student enrollment faster than the infrastructure or the staff were able to handle. By the end of the year, there were perhaps 4,000 students crammed into two buildings. And it meant getting degree-granting programs off the ground at a pace that made thoughtful and appropriate curriculum design impossible.

In the corporate universe, advertising precedes existence. Galgotias’ two-page ads in various magazines advertise a wide variety of programs; it looks like a fully functioning university. Much of it is smoke and mirrors (at least it was so at the time), and to maintain their legitimacy in the eyes of the government regulator of higher education, the University Grants Commission (UGC) and accreditation agencies, they had to fast-track the creation of programmes they claimed they already had. The ads claimed, for instance, that GU offered Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Ph.D. degrees in English, while in fact they were only just beginning to get the Bachelor’s programme off the ground. One day, ahead of some sort of visit by UGC inspectors, a couple of classrooms were given a new sign on their doors, and voila! we now had a School of Nursing.

Magic! Photo: wonderlane


So it isn’t with pride that I say that I designed the curriculum for the B. A. English Honours programme in all of ten days (three days longer than the week I’d been given). Mind you, I hadn’t seen the inside of a classroom yet , hadn’t met any students yet, and there I was, designing the curriculum. Foolishly, I went along with it, eager to prove my usefulness; I succumbed to the pressures of the fevered rush to get the programme off the ground. I must admit that the curriculum was, like the building we worked in, a mismatch and inappropriate for the students who enrolled in the programme. But more on this later.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Hurt, Despair, Longing, Rage and Revolt

- Jonathan Neale

This article is an attempt to say something about a debate on the British left about whether neoliberalism has changed the working class in ways which make struggle weaker. the author argue that neoliberalism has changed us in ways that make struggle harder, and easier, and different, and more explosive.

Something has to be fixed

For two years I have been trying an experiment in Britain ans the US. I say to someone :"Lots of people believe that there is something terribly wrong with this country- it has to be fixed - it won't be fixed - and no one is public life speaks for me."

Almost everyone nods and say, "Yes. That's me. I think that."

Every social occasion I go to now, in the pub, people over for a meal, a family do, the conversation turns to: what can we do?

This is a conversation about class, although people often don't put it to themselves that way.

Let's remind ourselves what class means. It's a relationship. A worker is anyone with a manager. The working class is everyone with a manager.

Some people say class has changed, and matters less now. that's wrong. Class has changed, and it matters more now. Our noses have been rubbed in class inequality every day for years. Inequality has grown in almost every country in the world. The power of management has increased at almost everyone's work. There is an epidemic of petty bullying and petty humiliation. Everyone has a story of something management did that invaded their dignity or a basic value.

Inequality increased right across our lives. Every increase in inequality is also an attack on some workers. A library closure, for example, is also an attack on library workers. And the language and values of the market are everywhere.

So people are full of hurt, anger and longing. It's not just that they hate the Tories. (Some do, some don't.) It goes deeper. They despair, and feel trapped.

What happened? What can we do?

How We Got Here

Our union movement in Britain used to be deeply decent and reformist. From 1939 to 1975 our grandparents built various kinds of rank and file networks. At the core were shop stewards, short strikes and a constant struggle over control at work. This was true of miners, car workers, dockers, hospital cleaners and social workers.

Steward, union leaders and workers were all trying to get a bigger piece of a growing economy. People's lives were getting better. Workers were more and more confident. Militants began to believe that confidence was crucial - each little victory could lead on to the next.

Serious Trouble

Then capitalism ran into serious trouble. Profits fell about 1970 and have stayed low. Capitalists in Britain and everywhere launched what we now call neoliberalism. This was an attempt to get profits back up by cutting the share of the national income going to working people. That meant holding down wages, benefits, pensions and services, trying to break our unions and making everyone more unequal. 

Neoliberalism was not a hobby for the powerful. It was critically important for them to make it work, because capitalism is competitive. Companies that don't make profits die. Without enough profits, Corporations fail.

But neoliberalism didn't work. Since 2008 we have all been trapped in a long economic crisis, with low profits and high unemployment. the capitalists' reaction has been austerity. That isn't working either.

But after 1970 our side, the workers, the people with a manager, ran into troubles too. The first problem was the collapse of "communism" in 1989. The soviet Union was socialist like cats are mice, and like torture is love. But even a lot of people in the Labour Party thought that Russia was somehow an alternative to capitalism. When that fell, almost everyone accepted the idea that communism had not worked and was not possible. 

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

On Transformative Politics: Comments at the “Echoes of Ghadar”

- Ravi Sinha

Note: The text below was presented on 27th October, 2013, at the “Echoes of Ghadar” Convergence, Organized by South Asia Solidarity Initiative (SASI) in New York, USA.

Transformative Politics is a large subject and one always runs the risk of stating the obvious while dealing with such things. One can also go entirely wrong. But there is an even greater danger. One may end up offering banalities that are – to borrow a phrase from a famous physicist – not even wrong. In these brief comments, I will try to state what may be obvious but useful to keep in mind nevertheless. And I will also stick my neck out enough to be proven wrong if that serves a purpose.

Transformative politics, in my opinion, is necessarily the politics of the Left. In the era of capitalism, Left is necessarily Marxist, although the term is interpreted variously. In today’s world, Left, despite its historic achievements of the past and despite its global spread now, is not doing very well. Capitalism, on the other hand, despite its recurrent crises and despite our daily declarations about it being moribund, is doing quite well. This describes the basic challenge confronting the Left today.

Now, I am aware that such a description, or diagnosis if you prefer, may disappoint many and for very different reasons. Back home, in certain circles, I would expect to be heckled as someone who has given up the fight. Why else would I say that Left is not doing well and capitalism is? In other circles I would be dismissed as someone incapable of learning any lessons. After the spectacular collapse of the twentieth century socialism, should it not be obvious that time is up for the Marxist Left? In these times of various ‘posts’-, including that of post-Marxism, how can one ascribe transformative politics exclusively to the Marxist Left? Does it not smack of the same old economism, class-reductionism, vanguardism and totalitarianism? Is it not being blind to the fact that transformative politics is now powered by a rainbow of new social movements? 

Instead of engaging with such questions right away, I will ask you to bear with me for a bit and take a call at the end.

Ideally, I should be dealing with both the questions – why is Left doing badly and why is capitalism doing well. The two might be correlated. But, given the time constraint and the nature of the occasion, I will take up only the first one – one about the Left. That, in any case, links more directly with the issue of transformative politics. 

My view, however, may be limited by my location. If I know a thing or two about the issue, it is only in the Indian context. But one hopes to have some relevance beyond the boundaries of one’s experience.

Left in the third world was born in the era of colonialism and feudalism. Those were the days of its glory. One thing it knows – and knows quite well – is how to fight feudal lords, kings, and foreign rulers. The problem is that it has not yet figured out how to deal with capitalism – its current adversary. Not a single revolution has happened so far by directly fighting capitalism under the political conditions of bourgeois democracy. The latest illustrative example may be from Nepal where the Left deposed the king but does not seem to know how to proceed from there. In India it often takes another route. It declares that India is still ruled by feudalism in the countryside and by foreigners and their compradors in the metropolis. Now, India is such a large and complicated place that you can find almost anything you are looking for. But finding the enemy of your choice does not add up to transformative politics. Left must figure out how to fight regular capitalism. And it should be able to do so without being subsumed in the parliament or without being confined to the outskirts. That is the first big challenge.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

A Gullgotia's Dairy Part-II

- Nagesh DB Rao

[This is the second part of the author's account of firsthand experience of the Indian variety of neoliberal education. Part memoir, part commentary, part unapologetic rant,A Gullgotia’s Diary hopes to reach you before Galgotias does. To Read A Gullgotia's Dairy Part- I click here]

CANADIAN ARCHITECTURE IN RURAL U. P.

In my defense, I must point out that I was not the only gull of Galgotias. In their effort to brand themselves as “world-class” institutions, India’s private universities are rushing to fill their websites with the credentials of “international faculty,” and Galgotias University is no exception. Some twenty-odd professors had been recruited that year from the U.S. and Europe. It didn’t take most of us long to discover that we’d been had.

For there was a yawning gap between image and reality, between what we were promised and what we were given. The place lacked the basic infrastructure of a university. The library, which seemed about the size of a mid-sized Crosswords or Borders bookstore, had a few dozens of copies of engineering textbooks, and that was about it. It had not a single–not one–book of literature. Okay, I know, it’s a new university, so we should give it time to build. But it wasn’t only lacking in what had not yet been built, it was lacking in what had already been built.

Take, for instance, the one semi-completed building that the university was housed in, a bland and uninspired clone of the corporate office buildings that dot the landscape of Indian cities today. (It was the template for Building #2, which was in the almost-not-yet-finished-but-already-wrecked stage when I left.) It’s a mundane place, an imposing stone-and-glass building with shiny floors, ceiling-to-floor glass walls on the inside, an open, echoing atrium, and large corporate logos splashed across the walls as you enter. ”If the university fails, they’ll just convert it into a mall,” we often joked, and we believed it too.

It was supposedly designed by a Canadian architect, because, as we all know, there are no architects in India. This architectural genius seems to have had little regard for the local climate, or for indigenous architectural preferences and practices, or for the ecological footprint of this 21st-century campus. The hermetically sealed classrooms and offices, with heat-trapping glass walls and roofing, necessitate central air-conditioning, while the building’s spatial orientation blocks the cooling breezes that sweep across the flat farmland all around.

A fake "photo" of the GU campus
A towering monstrosity
The atrium, which creates this greenhouse effect, also echoes the way a mall does. With no shade or shelter outside the building, let alone an adequate canteen, the students had no other space in which to hang out than the hallways. The din was continuous and unrelenting. So while teaching, you had to shut the doors to block the noise, but you couldn’t open the windows because … there weren’t any. Mind you, this isn’t Shimla or Bangalore but Delhi, where 40 degrees celsius is considered balmy. What would it take to centrally air-condition this absurd structure? Shouldn’t a university, in this day and age, build more responsibly, taxing the earth less? Of course, given management’s priorities, there was no air-conditioning installed, so the classrooms simply became saunas; if you will, sweatshops in at least this very narrow sense of the word.

The massive glass windows and the glass roofing came crashing down one day, thanks to a freak hailstorm, flooding the entire building. It was the janitorial staff (referred to at GU as “housekeeping staff” in the jargon of corporate hotels) who got the short end of the stick, as they were made to work extra hard to keep the floors and stairways dry as the rain kept pouring in the following day.

Friday, October 25, 2013

A Dream Team for the “Nation’s Cyclone of Change” or, Who’s Who in the Pantheon of Indian Fascism

- Youth Against Fascism

Amit Shah: Alias Mr Amnesia Shah, his standard response to all questions asked about his role in the carefully-planned encounter killings of 2003–2006 was ‘I don’t remember’; charged with extortion, murder and criminal conspiracy (in chargesheets filed between 2010 and 2012) and currently out on bail, Shah was even banned by the Supreme Court from entering Gujarat. In an interview to Headlines Today dated 21 Oct., 2013 he defended all the Gujarat encounter killings as directed at ‘anti-nationals’ and simultaneously disclaimed any prior knowledge of them. You can’t have it both ways, Amitbhai! What else was Vanzara saying to you? 

Narendra Modi: Puffed up monster, constructed by the RSS and the media to win the hearts and minds of ‘the youth’. And why is he a youth icon? Because he was in charge when over 2000 Indians were slaughtered in Gujarat in 2002 and did nothing to stop the slaughter; because he spent crores of rupees to make sure Gujarat doesn’t have an independent lokayukta; ask yourself why he moves heaven and hell to make sure no independent authority can investigate potential charges of corruption in his state. The man comes across as neanderthal and monosyllabic, but there are powerful forces at work to make everyone believe he is the most ‘popular’ politician India has ever had…ever…Adept at body language, Modi has made it abundantly clear that he enjoys a specially close relationship with Mukesh Ambani. ‘Sarkaar garibon ke liye hoti hai’, indeed! 

Yashwant Sinha: Walking economic disaster; both occasions when he was Finance Minister India’s economy saw severe economic downturns! In 1990 all the gold in the RBI’s vaults was shipped off to the Bank of England as collateral for a loan, and in March 2001, ‘soon after Sinha presented his Budget, India experienced one of its worst market crashes: about $32 billion worth of market capitalisation was wiped out that month’. Nor was his grasp of principle any stronger. In December 1992 he had publicly denounced the RSS/BJP as ‘obscurantist, fundamentalist and fascist’ only to join the BJP nine months later.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Brief Report on Communal Violence in Chippawad Town of Harda District in Madhya Pradesh

- Translated by Amrish Herdenia from Hindi to English

In Madhya Pradesh state of India, hardly a month passes without one or the other incident of communal violence not being reported from some or the other part of the state. Indore, Ratlam, Dewas, Khandwa, Harda, Betul, Sagar and Neemuch districts have become hotbed of communal violence. From the year 2005 up to the first quarter of 2013, as many as 945 communal incidents have taken place in the state. In 2012 alone, 89 communal incidents took place and on 92 occasions, there was a build-up of communal tension. Nine persons were killed and 241 sustained injuries in communal incidents in 2012. The state tops in the country as far as the number of communal incidents is concerned.

According to the information furnished in Indian parliament by the Central government, between 2009 and 2013, 432 communal incidents took place in the state and it was among the top three states in the country in this respect. 

The communal violence in Khirkiya Nagar Panchayat area of Harda district on September 19, 2013 is only yet another incident in this series.

Khirkiya (Harda)

Khirkiya is a Nagar Panchayat in Harda district of Madhya Pradesh, with a population of around 25,000. One-third of the residents are Muslims. The Nagar Panchayat is divided into 15 Wards and it was in one of the wards – Ward No 14 – which forms part of Chhipawad town, that the communal violence took place. Chhipawad is located about 30 km from Harda district headquarters and 5 km from Khirkiya block HQ. More than 90 per cent residents of Ward no 14 are Muslims. Other wards too have a mixed population. All the residents of ward numbers 12, 13, 14 settled here after they were displaced from Harsud town, which got submerged due to the construction of the Indira Sagar dam on river Narmada. The families are yet to get ownership rights on the land on which they have constructed their houses. Most of them are agricultural and manual laborers.

Chain of communal events

On September 19, 2013 (Thursday), at about 9 AM, Kalu, a Korku tribal, who works in the fields of a Muslim farmer Taj Khan, drove away a calf by hitting it with a stick as it was entering the field repeatedly. The animal, allegedly, died later. Within moments, a rumor was spread in the Chhipawad-Khirkiya area that Muslims had killed a cow and thrown its body. Subsequently, activists of Hindutva fundamentalist organizations like Bajrang Dal, Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Gau-Raksha Commando force, loaded the dead body of a other cow in a tractor-trolley and began a blockade of the Hoshangabad-Khandwa highway at the Maharana Pratap square of Chhipawad. Soon, a crowd comprising four to five thousand persons gathered at the spot and began raising provocative anti-Muslim slogans. At around 1 PM, the violent crowd got divided into two groups. One group assaulted the Imam of the local mosque and ransacked the mosque. The other group marched towards Chhipawad Ward no 14 and set 20-25 houses afire. The rioters also set ablaze around 30 two-wheelers, one jeep and a Matador. According to some eye-witnesses, a police van was following the rioters but the policemen remained mute spectators to the violence. When the probe team asked the Harda Superintendent of Police Deepak Verma about this, he said that the strength of police force in Harda district was comparatively less than other districts. Moreover, a section of the district police force was sent to Betul on that day for security arrangement for the visit of Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan. 

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

बयान: (मध्यप्रदेश राज्य अल्पसंख्यक आयोग के अध्यक्ष मोहम्मद अनवर खान द्वारा हरदा दंगे को हादसा कहे जाने के सन्दर्भ में )

नवदुनिया -हरदा , 3 अक्टूबर 2013
दिनांक 19 सितंबर 2013 को खिरकिया के छीपाबड़ में जो साम्प्रदायिक दंगे हुए है उसको लेकर मध्यप्रदेश अल्पसंख्यक आयोग के अध्यक्ष मोहम्मद अनवर खान द्वारा बीते 1 अक्टूबर 2013 को वहां दौरा किया गया था। दौरे के बाद राज्य अल्पसंख्यक आयेग के अध्यक्ष द्वारा स्थानीय मीडि़या में बयान दिया गया कि यह घटना दंगा नही बल्कि हादसा है। उन्होनें दंगा पीडि़तों को मुआवजा वितरण में तत्परता दिखाने के लिए स्थानीय प्रशासन की तारीफ भी की है।

हम सभी संगठन राज्य अल्पसंख्यक आयेग के अध्यक्ष के इस बयान की भ्रत्सना करते हैं। हमारे द्वारा 27 सिंतबर 2013 को इस घटना की फैक्ट फाइंडि़ग की़ गई थी जिसकी विस्तृत रिर्पोट सबंधित प्रशासनिक अधिकारियों व आयोगों को भी भेजी जा चूकी है। इसके अतिरिक्त हमारे द्वारा दिनांक 16 अक्टूबर 2013 को भी छीपाबड़ के दंगा प्रभावित क्षेत्र का पुनः दौरा किया गया है।

हमारे भ्रमण के दौरान यह तथ्य स्पष्ट रुप से निकल कर सामने आया है कि छीपाबड़ में हुई 19 सितंबर 2013 की घटना पूरी तरह से साम्प्रदायिक थी जिसमें एकतरफा और सुनियोजित तरीके से एक विषेश सम्प्रदाय को निशाना बना कर हमला किया गया। दंगाई़ पेट्रोल से भरी बोतलों और कुप्पियों से लैस थे। घरों के ऊपर पेट्रोल का छिड़काव करने से पहले भीड़ द्वारा विषेश समुदाय के घरों में घुस कर लूटपाट की गई और फिर पेट्रोल छिड़क कर वहां आग लगा दिया गया।

स्थानीय स्तर पर दोनो समुदाय के लोगों से बातचीत करने पर इस पूरी घटना क्रम के सूत्रधार के रुप में जिन दो पात्रों का नाम प्रमुख रुप से सामने आ रहा है उसमें से एक स्थानीय विधायक का बेटा तथा सुरेन्द्र पुरोहित (टाइगर) नाम का एक अन्य व्यक्ति है जो कि चारुआ में एक गौशाला का संचालन करता है और खुद को गौसेवा कमांड़ो का चेयरमेन कहता है। वह घटना के दिन से फरार है। पुलिस अधिक्षक द्वारा हमारी टीम के सामने भी यह पुष्टि की गई थी कि सुरेन्द्र पुरोहित द्वारा भीड़ के सामने बहुत ही भड़काऊ भाषण दिया था।

दंगें के बाद की स्थिति भी चिंताजनक है। इस दंगें में जो ज्यादातर गरीब परिवार आगजनी और हिंसा का शिकार हुए है वो पहले से ही हरसूद के विस्थापित हैं। प्रशासन द्वारा पीडि़तों को क्षतिपूर्ती के नाम पर 5 से 50 हजार का चेक दिया गया है जो कि क्षति के हिसाब से बहुत कम है। दंगें का बच्चों के मनोदशापर बहुत गहरा प्रभाव पड़ा है। वे अभी भी डरे सहमें हैं।

हमारा मानना है कि म.प्र अल्पसंख्यक आयोग केवल इसी घटना को लेकर ही नही बल्कि पिछले कुछ सालों के दौरान प्रदेश में घटी ज्यादातर साम्प्रदायिक घटनाओं में अपनी भूमिक निभाने में पूरी तरह से असफल रहा है।

हम मांग करते हैं कि अल्पंसख्यक आयेग के अध्यक्ष तथ्यों के ठोस जांच किये बिना बयान देना बंद करें। छीपाबड़ में हुई घटना का आयोग द्वारा गहनता से जांच करायी जानी चाहिऐ ताकि वह जमीनी हकीकत से रुबरु हो सकें। इसके अलावा इस एकतरफा हिंसा और आगजनी करने में जो लोग शामिल रहे हैं उनको सजा दिलाने और पीडि़तों को उचित,पर्याप्त और सम्मानपूर्ण मुआवजा दिलाने के लिए भी आयोग आगे आये और अपनी भूमिका का निष्पक्षता एवं ईमानदारी से निर्वाह करे।

जारीकर्ता

लज्जाशंकर हरदेनिया (वरिष्ठ पत्रकार व राष्ट्रीय सेकूलर मंच), योगेश दीवान (पिपुल्स रिसर्च सोसायटी), जावेद अनीस, (एन.एस.आई.भोपाल)विजय कुमार भा.क.पा.(मा-ले), दीपक विद्रोही (क्रांतिकारी नौजवान भारत सभा), उपासना बेहार (नागरिक अधिकार मंच), आजम खान (ऐडवोकेट)
**********

सम्बंधित पोस्ट / लिंक

छीपाबड़ (हरदा) के दंगा प्रभावित क्षेत्र में भोपाल के संगठनों द्वारा पुनः किये गये भ्रमण की संक्षिप्त रिर्पोट: Click here

27 सितम्बर 2013 को स्वतंत्र जांच दल द्वारा की गयी फैक्ट फाइंडिंग की पूरी रिपोर्ट: Click here

छीपाबड़ (हरदा) के दंगा प्रभावित क्षेत्र में भोपाल के संगठनों द्वारा पुनः किये गये भ्रमण की संक्षिप्त रिर्पोट


दिनांक 16 अक्टूबर 2013 को छीपाबड़ के दंगा पीडि़तों के साथ ईद मनाने एवं राहत सामग्री को पहुंचाने के लिए भोपाल से 4 सदस्यी टीम के द्वारा दंगा प्रभावित क्षेत्र का दौरा किया गया। इस टीम में भोपाल स्थित संगठनों एन.एस.आई.भोपाल के जावेद अनीस एवं उपासना बेहार, भा.क.पा.(मा-ले), के विजय कुमार और क्रांतकारी नौजवान भारत सभा के दीपक बंदुले शामिल थे। इसके अलावा नर्मदा बचाओं आंदोलन के साथियों द्वारा भी राहत सामग्री के साथ यहाँ भ्रमण किया गया।

ज्ञात हो कि हरदा जिले के छीपाबड़ में हुए दंगे को लेकर उपरोक्त संगठनों द्वारा दिनांक 27 सितम्बर 2013 को स्वंतत्र जांच के लिए दौरा किया गया था। इस फेक्ट फाइंडिंग टीम द्वारा तैयार रिपोर्ट को संबंधित प्रशासनिक अधिकारियों व आयोगो को मांग पत्र के साथ सौपा जा चुका है।

आज भोपाल एवं एनबीए से आयी टीमों द्वारा दंगा पीडि़त परिवारों के साथ ईद मनायी गई एवं राहत सामगी का वितरण किया गया। सदस्यों का कहना था कि हमारे आने का मकसद पीडि़तों के साथ खुशी के इस माहौल को साझा करना तथा भाईचारा का संदेश देना था।

इस दौरान टीम द्वारा दंगा पीडि़त परिवारों के साथ बातचीत भी की गई। इस दौरान निम्नलिखित समस्याऐं निकल कर आयी -

पीडि़तों द्वारा बताया गया कि दंगें के तुरंत बाद तहसीलदार और पटवारी द्वारा हुए नुकसान का जायजा लिया गया था परन्तु यह समझ से परे है कि पीडि़तों को उनके हुए नुकसान के आधार पर मुआवजा क्यों नही मिला?

मुआवजा के नाम पर पीडि़तों को बहुत कम राशि दी गई है जबकि उनका नुकसान दी गई राशि से गई गुना ज्यादा हुआ है। उदाहरण के तौर पर अजीज खान जिनका दंगाईयों द्वारा हमले के दौरान सबकुछ - पूरा घर,समान,अनाज,दो गाड़ियाँ आदि जल कर खाक हो गये हैं और अंदाजन उनका तकरीबन 10लाख का नुकसान हुआ है जबकि उन्हें मुआवजे के नाम पर मात्र 50 हजार रुपये दिया गया है। अजीज खान की तरह ऐसे लगभग 10 परिवार है जिनका सबकुछ जल कर खाक हो गया है जबकि मुआवजे के नाम पर महज खानापूर्ती की गई है।

दंगा पीडित लगभग सभी परिवारों के पास गरीबी रेखा कार्ड तक नही है। हालाकि ये ये परिवार हरसूद से विस्थापित है,विस्थापन से पहले इन लोगों के पास गरीबी रेखा के कार्ड थे जो की यहाँ आने के बाद निरस्त हो गये हैं। 

पीडि़तों ने टीम को यह भी बताया कि अभी भी कुछ लोगों के बैंको में खाते नही खुले इसलिए उनका मुआवजा मिलने में  दिक्खत  हो रही है ।

दंगे का बच्चों पर मनोवैज्ञानिक रुप से बहुत ही नकारात्मक असर पड़ा है। ज्यादातर बच्चे अभी भी डरे-सहमें है, अजनबियों को देख कर घर में भागते हैं, ज्यादातर  बच्चे अभी स्कूल भी नही जाते हैं। 

टीम का कहना है कि उपरोक्त समस्याओं को लेकर वे स्थानीय प्रषासन और भोपाल स्तर पर संबंधित अधिकारियों से पुनः मिलकर इस सबंध में उचित कार्यवाही की मांग करेगें ताकि पीडि़यों को उचित और सम्मानपूर्ण मुआवजा और न्याय मिल सके।

टीम सदस्य

जावेद अनीस, उपासना बेहार (एन.एस.आई.भोपाल), विजय कुमार भा.क.पा.(मा-ले), दीपक विद्रोही (क्रांतिकारी नौजवान भारत सभा)
**********
सम्बंधित पोस्ट / लिंक

27 सितम्बर 2013 को स्वतंत्र जांच दल द्वारा की गयी फैक्ट फाइंडिंग की पूरी रिपोर्ट: Click here

Sunday, October 20, 2013

How Modi Sanitises Untouchability!

- Subhash Gatade

Not very many people would have read about a study by an American scholar Stephanie Tam of the Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Northwestern University, about the status of sewerage system in Ahmedabad. Titled "Coprology and Caste: The Status of Sewerage in Ahmedabad, India”, it brings home a stark point that Ahmedabad may be one of the earliest pioneers of sewerage system in the 19th century but it has not only failed to solve manual scavenging; rather manual scavenging has been given a new form. 

In fact the absence of change in the lifeworlds of the people engaged in scavenging can be had by comparing two reports. The report brought out by Scavenger's Living Conditions Enquiry Committee (1955) reveals that Bhangis in the region had no latrines, and lived next to dumping grounds and open drains whereas a 2006 state-wide study, tells us that 45.4 per cent of Bhangis still had no toilets and no bathrooms, their unsanitary living conditions being used to justify their polluted status.

It is important to look into details of the matter as the chief minister of the state is engaged in telling people outside the state that they have 'solved' the problem successfully. 

Look at the “A Road Map for Zero Waste Ahmedabad City – A Visionary Document to Guide Ahmedabad towards Becoming a Resource Efficient and Zero Waste City by 2031”, which was recently released as an official document. Analysing it Jitendra Rathod ( Senior activist with Janvikas, Ahmedabad) tells us how it provides “visionary” insights into how to make Ahmedabad a zero waste city in less than two decades but surprisingly, the document is silent on the plight of the manual scavengers: The document has been financed and commissioned jointly by the AMC and the United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD). The document addresses several concerns of waste and waste management – except the safety and better health of the sweepers! 

The title page of the document is sufficient to prove the casteist mindset of the AMC administration. The document claims to be “visionary”, but the sweepers will continue to collect the garbage, dust, filth of the city by unclean way. 

The so-called visionary document mentions that almost 1,10,667 metric tonnes (MT) of solid waste is generated in the city on a monthly basis. Out of this, most of it, 1,08,454 MT, is collected manually by sweepers. The document itself accepts that these wastes are collected by sweepers in an unclean way to keep the city neat, clean and a better place to live in.

II

Undoubtedly, Narendra Modi, would not have imagined that his exhortation that 'toilets first, temples later' at a Delhi conclave would not only generate a debate within the saffron fraternity but would also bring back focus on the pathetic situation of sanitation in his home state itself. And the ensuing discussion would also transcend to his controversial ideas about untouchability - the social-religious practice based on the logic of purity and pollution which has marginalised, terrorised and relegated a section of Indian society to a life marked by humiliation and indignity. 

Coming to the figures about sanitation in the state. If the 2001 census had shown rural sanitation coverage meaning three basic facilities — drinking water, electricity and sanitation - merely at a low 21%, the 2012-13 India Rural Development Report tells us that it has reached merely 25 % of the state's population. The situation is not very encouraging in urban areas as well. 

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

A Gullgotia's Diary Part -I

- Nagesh DB Rao

[This is the first part of the author's account of firsthand experience of the Indian variety of neoliberal education. Part memoir, part commentary, part unapologetic rant, A Gullgotia’s Diary hopes to reach you before Galgotias does.]

Go ahead, call me gullible. Tell me I should have seen it coming.

“How could you not have known it would be like this? The name itself is a dead giveaway.”

“Who ever heard of a university with a name like that?!”

I can’t recall how many conversations with friends and family these last few months have ended with exactly these words. That name, Galgotias University, emblazoned on virtually every square foot of advertising space in India on land and in the air (with in-flight magazine ads that are as garish as they are deceptive), and how it seemed somehow ill-suited for a university, has served as the Lowest Common Denominator of our collective derision. After all is said and done, the very absurdity of its name offers a way to laugh off the experience of working there and heave a final sigh of resignation. So call me naive for not seeing it all from the very beginning, for not being sensitive enough to what my ears were supposed to tell me when I heard those sounds coming out of my mouth: /gal-go-tee-yaz/ /yu-ni-ver-si-ti/.

Okay, let’s not mock the name. “Harvard” (/haar-verd/) is weird-sounding too if you think about it. Let’s mock the ads instead. Whle driving from Delhi to Greater Noida, at some point on the DND Flyway you’ll find yourself staring at this giant billboard with the Galgotias name and logo, informing you that “THINKING QUOTIENT IS THE FUTURE.” Ponder that for a minute. Is it a puzzle? A riddle? Part of a sentence uttered by a man whose son is named Quotient? Now you know why there are so many accidents on the DND Flyway.

Galgotias University advert
So I should have known that behind the glossy magazine ads and oversized billboards, the fancy website and promo videos claiming that Galgotias offers a “world-class education,” I would find a poorly managed business venture whose profit-mongering makes a mockery of pedagogy, stifles intellectual growth, and distorts and disfigures the teaching-learning process.

But even as a business venture, the place is a disaster. Unable to secure financing for whatever shady or unshady reasons, the owner of this neoliberal corporate university–sorry, the “Honorable Chancellor Sir”–is often unable to pay his bills. Particularly his wage bill. One would think that this would interfere with sound management principles. The owner’s 20-something son, the CEO of the university (I’m not kidding), has a BBA after all, and should have told his old man that unpaid workers are unproductive workers. During my (thankfully brief) tenure at this place, there were several months when we didn’t get paid on time. The only staff who were spared this humiliation were the security guards, because they aren’t on Galgotias’ payroll. Lucky for them.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

मध्य प्रदेश के हरदा जिले में हुए साम्प्रदायिक हिंसा की तहकीकात रिपोर्ट


27 सितम्बर 2013 को  6 सदस्यीय स्वतंत्र जांच दल द्वारा मध्य प्रदेश के हरदा जिले के खिरकिया में हुई साम्प्रदायिक घटना की जांच हेतु वहां का दौरा किया गया था । यहाँ प्रस्तुत है फैक्ट फाइंडिंग टीम के रिपोर्ट का प्रमुख निष्कर्ष !  पूरी रिपोर्ट यहाँ पढ़ी जा सकती है.



ध्यप्रदेश में पिछले लगभग दस वर्षों से शासन कर रही भाजपा सरकार  लगातार ऐसे कदम उठा रही है जिनसे अल्पसंख्यकों में भय व्याप्त हो रहा है। इस दौर में भाजपा के सहयोगी संगठन भी अत्यंत मुखर व आक्रामक हो गए हैं। राज्य में संघ परिवार को अपनी मनमानी करने की एक तरह से छूट मिली दिख रही है।

कुछ सालों पहले मध्यप्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री ने सरकारी कर्मचारियों से आव्हान कर दिया है कि वे आर.एस.एस. की सदस्यता लें। मध्यप्रदेश में हिन्दू संस्कृति को पिछले दरवाजे से जनता पर लादने का तरीका अपनाया जा रहा है। हर मौके का इस्तेमाल हिन्दू धार्मिक शब्दावली को शासकीय शब्दावली का भाग बनाने के लिए किया जा रहा है। जैसे स्कूल शिक्षकों के लिए ऋषि संबोधन चुना गया,राज्य की बालिका कल्याण योजना का नाम है लाडली लक्ष्मीबाल पोषण योजना को  अन्नप्राशनजल संरक्षण कार्यक्रम का जलाभिषेक कहा जाता है । स्कूलों में सूर्य नमस्कार“ करवाया जाता है।राज्य के स्कूलों में योग अनिवार्य भी कर दिया गया था। बाद में उसे ऐच्छिक विषय बना दिया गया। परंतु चूंकि अधिकांश हिन्दू विद्यार्थी योग सीखते हैं अतः अल्पसंख्यक छात्र-छात्राओं का स्वयं को अलग-थलग महसूस करना स्वभाविक है।

दूसरी तरफ मध्यप्रदेश ,संघी आतंकवादियों की शरणस्थली व गढ़ के रूप में भी उभरा है। सुनील जोशीप्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुरकालसांगरादेवेन्द्र शर्मासंदीप डांगे व अन्य हिंदुत्ववादी आतंकीमध्यप्रदेश में बेखौफ अपना काम करते रहे।

मध्यप्रदेश  में बिना साम्प्रदायिक घटना घटे कोई भी महीना नही गुजरता है। खास तौर पर इदौररतलामदेवासबुरहानपुरखंडवाहरदाबैतूलसागरनीमच आदि जिले उन्मादी धार्मिक हिंसा का लगातार शिकार हुऐ है।हाल ही में केंद्र सरकार द्वारा लोक सभा में दी गयी जानकारी के अनुसार मध्यप्रदेश में पिछले 2009 से 2013 के बीच कुल 432 साम्प्रदायिक घटनायें हुई हैइस दौरान मध्यप्रदेशदेश में  तीसरे  स्थान पर रहा है। 19 सितम्बर 2013 को हरदा जिले के खिरकिया नगर पंचायत में हुई साम्प्रदायिक हिंसा प्रदेश भी इसी सिलसिले की एक कड़ी जान पड़ती है।

जांच दल:- 

दिनांक 27 सितम्बर 2013 को भोपाल से एक 6 सदस्यीय स्वतंत्र जांच दल ने दिनांक 19 सितम्बर 2013 खिरकिया में हुई साम्प्रदायिक घटना की जांच हेतु खिरकिया का दौरा किया। यह छः सदस्यीय टीम खिरकिया में हुए साम्प्रदायिक दंगें के पीडि़तों के अतिरिक्त वहां के पत्रकारोंसामाजिक कार्यकर्ताओं व पुलिस अधीक्षक आदि से मुलाकात की। जांच दल में शामिल लोग इस प्रकार थे:- लज्जाशंकर हरदेनिया (वरिष्ठ पत्रकार व राष्ट्रीय सेकूलर मंच)योगेश दीवान (पिपुल्स रिसर्च सोसायटी)सुन्दर खड़से (महाड़)विजय कुमार भा.क.पा.(मा-ले)दीपक विद्रोही (क्रांतिकारी नौजवान भारत सभा)उपासना बेहार (एन.एस.आई.भोपाल)आजम खान (ऐडवोकेट)।


Thursday, October 3, 2013

Gandhi, Patel versus Modi

- Subhash Gatade

Narendra Modi (NaMo as he is popularly known) wants to usher in 'Congress free India'.

In his maiden speech after being elected as the Election Campaign Chief at the party's Goa conclave, he had clearly said it in no uncertain terms. 

As one can recall, this part of his speech came under severe criticism and it was underlined that it shows his fascistic mindset. It was said that Modi does not want merely to defeat Congress politically but wants to obliterate it completely as if the Grand Old Party of India was synonymous to a pest which needed this specific treatment.

Now supposedly to offset this charge, he has come out with a fresh explanation of the same statement. He has invoked Gandhi to say that the idea of 'Congress free India' did not belong to him and was initially expressed by Gandhi and by reiterating it he just wanted to fulfill Mahatma's dream. 

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Designing Freedom, Regulating a Nation: Socialist Cybernetics in Allende’s Chile

- Eden Medina

[Note: A PDF version of this longish article can be downloaded from NSI's Scribd page. Click here]

Abstract: This article presents a history of ‘Project Cybersyn’, an early computer network developed in Chile during the socialist presidency of Salvador Allende (1970–1973) to regulate the growing social property area and manage the transition of Chile’s economy from capitalism to socialism. Under the guidance of British cybernetician Stafford Beer, often lauded as the ‘father of management cybernetics’, an interdisciplinary Chilean team designed cybernetic models of factories within the nationalised sector and created a network for the rapid transmission of economic data between the government and the factory floor. The article describes the construction of this unorthodox system, examines how its structure reflected the socialist ideology of the Allende government, and documents the contributions of this technology to the Allende administration.

On 12 November 1971 British cybernetician Stafford Beer met Chilean President Salvador Allende to discuss constructing an unprecedented tool for economic management. For Beer the meeting was of the utmost importance; the project required the president’s support. During the previous ten days Beer and a small Chilean team had worked frantically to develop a plan for a new technological system capable of regulating Chile’s economic transition in a manner consistent with the socialist principles of Allende’s presidency. The project, later referred to as ‘Cybersyn’ in English and ‘Synco’ in Spanish,[1] would network every firm in the expanding nationalized sector of the economy to a central computer in Santiago, enabling the government to grasp the status of production quickly and respond to economic crises in real time. Although Allende had been briefed on the project ahead of time, Beer was charged with the task of explaining the system to the President and convincing him that the project warranted government support.

Accompanied only by his translator, a former Chilean Navy officer named Roberto Can˜ete, Beer walked to the presidential palace in La Moneda while the rest of his team waited anxiously at a hotel bar across the street. ‘A cynic could declare that I was left to sink or swim,’ Beer later remarked. ‘I received this arrangement as one of the greatest gestures of confidence that I ever received; because it was open to me to say anything at all.’[2] The meeting went quite well. Once they were sitting face to face (with Can˜ete in the middle, discreetly whispering translations in each man’s ear), Beer began to explain his work in ‘management cybernetics,’ a field he founded in the early 1950s and cultivated in his subsequent publications.[3] At the heart of Beer’s work stood the ‘viable system model’, a five-tier structure based on the human nervous system, which Beer believed existed in all stable organizations – biological, mechanical and social. Allende, having trained previously as a pathologist, immediately grasped the biological inspiration behind Beer’s cybernetic model and knowingly nodded throughout the explanation. This reaction left quite an impression on the cybernetician. ‘ I explained the whole damned plan and the whole viable system model in one single sitting ... and I 've never worked with anybody at the high level who understood a thing I was saying.’[4]

Beer acknowledged the difficulties of achieving real-time economic control, but emphasised that a system based on a firm understanding of cybernetic principles could accomplish technical feats deemed impossible in the developed world, even with Chile’s limited technological resources.

Once Allende gained a familiarity with the mechanics of Beer’s model, he began to reinforce the political aspects of the project and insisted that the system behave in a ‘decentralising, worker-participative, and anti-bureaucratic manner’.[5] When Beer finally reached the top level of his systematic hierarchy, the place in the model Beer had reserved for Allende himself, the president leaned back in his chair and said, ‘At last, el pueblo.’[6] With this succinct utterance, Allende reframed the project to reflect his ideological convictions and view of the presidential office, which often equated his political leadership with the rule of the people. By the end of the conversation, Beer had secured Allende’s blessing to continue the project.

At face value, a meeting between a British cybernetician and a Chilean president, particularly one as controversial as Allende, seems most unusual.[7] The brief presidency of the Unidad Popular (UP) has arguably inspired more historical scholarship than any other moment in Chilean history. Despite this wealth of literature, little is known about the Chilean government’s experiment with cybernetics during this period and less about its contribution to the UP’s experiment in democratic socialism.[8] The nature of the meeting between Beer and Allende suggests that writing technology into one of the most widely studied periods of Latin American history will bring to light an unstudied facet of the Chilean revolution and, in the process, demonstrate the value of this framework for analysis. In part, documenting the construction of this system provides information on the extent of Chile’s technological capabilities during the early 1970s. More importantly however, the project provides a window for viewing new tensions within the UP coalition, Chile, and the international community at large. The impressions and aspirations expressed by various project participants furthermore reveal an alternative history of the UP era grounded in technological optimism and the merging of science and politics to bring about social and economic change. This article argues that the UP experiment with cybernetics and computation constitutes another innovative, yet unexplored, feature of Chile’s democratic road to socialism. For this reason, examining this technological project promises to enrich our understanding of this complex moment in Chilean history.

Knowledge of this technological undertaking moreover contributes to the literature in the history of science and technology, particularly with respect to studies of cybernetics and the history of computing. The meeting between Beer and Allende suggests that cybernetics, an interdisciplinary science encompassing ‘the entire field of communication theory, whether in the machine or in the animal’, achieved a level of importance in Chile during this period, and that Allende’s Chilean revolution was open to these cybernetic ideas and their application.[9] However, most discussions of cybernetics to date focus on the evolution of these ideas and their application within the USA and the European contexts and do not address how they migrated to other parts of the world such as Latin America. Chilean history provides a clear of example of how alternative geographical and political settings gave rise to new articulations of cybernetic ideas and innovative uses of computer technology, ultimately illustrating the importance of including Latin American experiences in these bodies of scholarship.[10] This article will first present an explanation of how cybernetics entered Chilean consciousness, attracted the attention of the nation’s president, and guided the construction of this singular technological system.

From a different angle, the meeting between Beer and Allende also illustrates the importance of both technological soundness and political ideology in Cybersyn’s construction. Although the project was technically ambitious, from the outset it could not be characterised as simply a technical endeavour to regulate the economy. From the perspective of project team members, it could help make Allende’s socialist revolution a reality – ‘ revolutionary computing’ in the truest sense. Moreover, the system had to accomplish this goal in a manner ideologically congruent with Allende’s politics. As this article will demonstrate, the tensions surrounding Cybersyn’s design and construction mirrored the struggle between centralisation and decentralisation that plagued Allende’s dream of democratic socialism. 

Throughout Allende’s presidency, Chile’s political polarisation strongly influenced the perception of the project and its role in Chilean society. The interplay of cybernetic ideas, Marxist ideology and computer technology found in the project illustrates how science and technology contributed to Chilean ideas of governance during the early 1970s and altered the possibilities for socialist transformation. Explicating this multi-faceted relationship constitutes the final focus of this article and demonstrates that studies of technology can expand our knowledge of historical and political processes within the Latin American region.