New
Socialist Initiative stands in solidarity with the people of Assam, Tripura and
the other North Eastern states in their heroic struggle against the communally
motivated Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB). It was only because of the
resistance of the people that the government couldn’t table the Bill for voting
in the Rajya Sabha after surreptitiously passing it in the Lok Sabha. This is
in fact a victory for all the progressive and democratic forces of the
country,who have been fighting to save and expand the secular character of the
nation. While the danger still looms large and there is a strong possibility
that the government may try to bring back the bill in the upcoming budget
session, the mass resistance of the people has demonstrated very clearly that
the evil designs of the fascists in power will not go unanswered and that the
people will fight back with all their might.
Perhaps it is a testimony to the
success of the peoples’ resistance and the frustration of the fascist rulers
that the Assam police slapped sedition charges against three prominent
personalities of the state, who have been leading the mass resistance against
the CAB in the state. Marxist literary critic Dr. Hiren Gohain, KMSS leader
Akhil Gogoi and senior journalist Manjit Mahanta have been booked under Sections 120(B), 121, 123
and 124(A) of the IPC. In Tripura, numerous protectors have been beaten up by
the police and the state government has prevented civil society delegations
from neighbouring states from visiting and meeting the injured. We appeal to
all the left, democratic and secular forces of the country to condemn such
fascist attempts to muzzle democratic dissent and raise their voice in
solidarity with protesters.
Although
granting unconditional citizenship to all the Hindus of the world has always
been a fantasy of the RSS, there is a local context to the urgent manner in
which the CAB has been pushed through in the parliament. In Assam, an exercise
to update the National Register of Citizens (NRC) has been going on for the
past few years. The exercise seeks to identify the genuine citizens of the
country and thereby exclude illegal foreigners living in the state. In July
2018, the draft NRC was published and around 40 lakh people found their names
excluded from the draft list. Out of these 30 lakhs have now reapplied and they
await final processing of their applications by the NRC authority. While
initially it was thought that most of the excluded belong to the Bengali Muslim
community, and Amit Shah even went to the extent of declaring these 40 lakh
people as termites, gradually it was discovered that a substantial number of
Hindu Bengalis have also been excluded.
For understandable reasons, the issue created much furore in the country. But instead of tackling the issue sensitively, the government decided to engage in a politics of religious polarisation. The BJP government argued that it is the Muslim immigrants, who are the real enemy. They also told the public that the excluded Hindus (irrespective of whether they are Indian citizens or Bangladeshi refugees) need not worry because the government will be bringing an enabling constitutional amendment for them soon. In fact, such an amendment was already in the pipeline for some time. In July 2016, the central government had tabled a Citizenship Amendment Bill, according to which non-Muslim refugees coming from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan without valid travel documents would not be treated as illegal migrants. But due to stiff opposition in the parliament as well as streets of Assam, it was referred back to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for wider public consultation. But now, as the NRC debate came to the forefront, BJP expressed its determination to pass the bill at any cost. Even before the consultation period was over, the government forced the JPC to file a final report, despite vigorous protests of the JPC members. Amazingly, within one hour of the submission of the JPC report, the Cabinet approved it and in the very next day, the Citizenship Amendment Bill was pushed through the Lok Sabha! Unfortunately for the BJP, this brazen attempt to divide the people on the basis of religion didn’t cut ice in Assam and the rest of the North East. Contrary to expectations of the central government, even more militant protests have broken out in Assam and other North Eastern states this time, against the bill. As one former BJP worker from the region has put it, “they wanted to turn Hindus against Muslims, they’ve turned Hindus against Hindus.”
For understandable reasons, the issue created much furore in the country. But instead of tackling the issue sensitively, the government decided to engage in a politics of religious polarisation. The BJP government argued that it is the Muslim immigrants, who are the real enemy. They also told the public that the excluded Hindus (irrespective of whether they are Indian citizens or Bangladeshi refugees) need not worry because the government will be bringing an enabling constitutional amendment for them soon. In fact, such an amendment was already in the pipeline for some time. In July 2016, the central government had tabled a Citizenship Amendment Bill, according to which non-Muslim refugees coming from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan without valid travel documents would not be treated as illegal migrants. But due to stiff opposition in the parliament as well as streets of Assam, it was referred back to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for wider public consultation. But now, as the NRC debate came to the forefront, BJP expressed its determination to pass the bill at any cost. Even before the consultation period was over, the government forced the JPC to file a final report, despite vigorous protests of the JPC members. Amazingly, within one hour of the submission of the JPC report, the Cabinet approved it and in the very next day, the Citizenship Amendment Bill was pushed through the Lok Sabha! Unfortunately for the BJP, this brazen attempt to divide the people on the basis of religion didn’t cut ice in Assam and the rest of the North East. Contrary to expectations of the central government, even more militant protests have broken out in Assam and other North Eastern states this time, against the bill. As one former BJP worker from the region has put it, “they wanted to turn Hindus against Muslims, they’ve turned Hindus against Hindus.”
It
should also be noted that while the North Eastern states are witnessing strong
opposition to the Citizenship Amendment Bill, the prevalence of confusion
around the objectives and provisions of the bill has proved to be a stumbling
block in the process of building a strong movement against the bill in the rest
of the country. More than ever, it is necessary to say it loudly that the bill
has nothing to do with humanitarian concerns for the minorities in the
neighbouring countries, and is all about the plan to build a Hindu Rastra out
of India. The bill very cleverly divides the citizenship seekers into two
categories based on religion and excludes from its purview all non-Muslim
majority countries in the neighbourhood. Rather than breaking barriers and
helping the oppressed and the persecuted, the bill in effect will further
solidify artificial barriers and increase religion based distrust and hostility
in the entire South Asian region. In fact, it will lend a helping hand to the
religious fundamentalist forces in neighbouring states to project their Hindu minorities
as untrustworthy and agents of India, just like the Hindu fundamentalists have
been projecting the Muslim and the Christian minorities of India as foreign and
untrustworthy.
As
a socialist platform NSI believes in the ideal of free movement of people,
ideas and solidarities across national borders. We strongly believe that the
problems of communalism, religious fundamentalism, economic deprivation and
ecological disaster in our region can be successfully addressed only at the
level of the entire South Asia, with voluntary coming together of different
nations of the region. It is a matter of much regret that in recent times there
has been a consistent rise in conflict and distrust between different states of
South Asia and we have allowed our politicians to indulge in fantasies of hard
borders. Consistent bullying of smaller countries of the region by successive
Indian governments is also a fact. But despite this, it is undeniable that a
regime of people to people free exchange between different countries will be
best for everyone. In fact, what we need is a bold vision, which would ensure
progressive relaxation in the movement of people, commodities and resources
across national borders in the entire region. This vision should also entail
radical curtailment of defence expenditure by all the neighbouring nations,
substantial state investment in basic public amenities and decommodificaion of
all major arenas of the economy necessary for a
decent human life. NSI believes in building a society where migration is
voluntary and which creates no refugees.
NSI
also believes that we need to commit seriously towards sustaining the diversity
of cultures in our country and the entire South Asian region. This requires
that adequate constitutional safeguards and protections must be provided,
consolidated and extended to all communities which find themselves politically,
economically, and socially vulnerable in their respective regions. It is an
undeniable fact that in many parts of the North East and especially in Assam,
migration of people from Bengal induced by the British rulers drastically
altered the demography of the region, so much so that the Assamese and other
indigenous communities found themselves outnumbered in their land. This led to
a long drawn out conflict and mutual distrust between the migrant and the
indigenous communities and helped create a regime of what political scientist
Sanjib Baruah has termed as ‘durable disorder’.
NSI
believes that such problems can be addressed by providing adequate and well
thought out constitutional safeguardsto the Assamese community and
strengthening the already existing safeguards for other indigenous communities.
To be sure, special care should be taken while designing such constitutional
safeguards so that they do not strengthen archaic notions of ‘pure ethnic
homelands’. Proper constitutional safeguards will assure the small and
vulnerable communities about their future and pave the ground for easy passage
of radical policies on immigration and intra-regional cooperation.
Our
commitment towards migrants, refugees and citizenship-seekers do not have to
come in conflict with our commitment towards protecting the culture, identity
and politico-economic life of the already existing small and vulnerable
communities. In fact, they can complement each other. A compact association of
South Asian nations, with free movement of people, ideas and commodities can be
founded only on the basis of respecting and protecting the diversity of the
region. It is noteworthy that while on the one hand the present Indian
government seeks to divide refugees on the basis of religion, on the other
hand, it has turned the clause 6 of Assam Accord (originally designed to
protect the Assamese and other indigenous communities) into a complete joke.
This is a sure shot recipe to disaster.
NSI
reiterates its solidarity with the people of North East in their struggle
against the Constitutional Amendment Bill and appeals all the left, democratic
and secular forces of the country to initiate a strong movement against
divisive designs of fascist rulers. There is nothing irresistible about
fascism; it can be fought and defeated.
.............
0 comments:
Post a Comment